Using it, I get a cleaner soundstage, without it, it feels like there may be a few frequencies that are just a bit too loud. For the L/R speakers I go back and forth between using Audyssey and bypassing it. It is literally night/day different in the bass frequencies, so I am happy to have it. Not sure how much of a difference (if any) you'd notice between XT and XT32, but FWIW - and according to the Audyssey website, the filter resolution (satellites) for: - MultEQ is 2x - MultEQ XT is 16xI do like the EQ job it does especially on the subwoofer. During Auto Setup, MultEQ XT first finds how many loudspeakers are connected in the. There are two components to MultEQ XT: -Multi-listener equalization.

They need to change how they are compressing this, why not use a multi-band compressor if they already aren't? The only time I'd turn something like this on is when watching Das Boot, for example, and the explosions were scaring the guests.Dynamic EQ- I really like what this does for movie watching. In the pro kit, you can set the level of high end roll off for each speaker.Dynamic Volume-I'd only ever use this one 'low' because med/high have way too many artifacts. So for my center channel I might like to keep all the high end (Audyssey 'flat') for vocal intelligibility, but on all the other speakers I prefer the high-end roll off that Audyssey incorporates (standard 'Audyssey' setting). One simple fact that the proponents of this theory seem to overlook is that even the best designed loudspeakers will suffer from artifacts at high frequencies produced by reflections from nearby flat surfaces such as plasma screens or cabinets.What are target curves and how are they used with Audyssey MultEQ and MultEQ XT's EQ Mode Settings Contrary to popular belief, a target curve that is flat from 20 Hz to 20 kHz is not always the one that will produce the correct sound.Huge drawback-you can't set curves for each speaker individually (without a pro kit). If the loudspeaker is in fact properly designed then no correction will be applied to it.

When you take measurements and average them, all data points get figured into the average, even if they are anomalous and way out of line with others. The entire concept uses Fuzzy Clustering as a significant improvement over averaging of any kind. In fact, a single measurement is often used as a confirmation that Audyssey is actually functioning because the difference between 'in' and 'bypass' will be fairly radical, though the EQ won't be meaningful.Audyssey, of any flavor, doesn't do a simple 'weighted average'. A single-point setup will never sound right, no matter how many measurements you take in that position. This doesn't bug me, but it may for those who have a lot of hi-def tracks.The way I figure it, below 200hz the room becomes a major factor in your SQ so it makes sense to address it through acoustic treatments, placement options, and finally, filtering solutions.Click to expand.I understand your logic, but Audyssey doesn't work that way. Also, depending on your version of Audyssey, I know it downsamples hi-def music to CD quality.

Audyssey Multeq Xt